Motor City – UN Studio, MVRDV

Ciudad del motor - Bird view

Ciudad del Motor, Bird View (UN Studio – 2006, Alcaniz, Spain)

MVRDV, motor city competition entry - Plaza

Ciudad del Motor, Plaza (MVRDV – 2006, Alcaniz, Spain)

UN Studio and MVRDV (in col­lab­o­ra­tion with the span­ish office GRAS) have recently sent us their com­peti­ton entries for the Ciudad del Motor in Spain, which has been won by the widely pub­lished, but less inter­est­ing fish-​shaped design by Foster.

UN Studio’s design is a con­tin­u­ous dynamic form, a struc­ture duck­ing to the ground with a motor-​sport aes­thetic, remind­ing of the visual lan­guage of an BMW ad. MVRDV’s pro­posal is a group of build­ings – blocks break­ing from the ground in a sandy desert, cre­at­ing an ensem­ble of squares. Where UN Studio’s design is a new object in the land­scape, MVRDV’s design forms part of it. More of a place, less of an object. You can down­load MVRDV’s project PDF, com­plete with sec­tions and plans (Thank you, Oana!) here:

[display_​podcast]

UN Studio’s project description:

The build­ing is orga­nized as a con­tin­u­ous loop with two cross­ing points, offer­ing mul­ti­ple vis­i­tor expe­ri­ences all related to thetopic of speed and move­ment. Like a real city, the design for the Ciudad del Motor con­tains and facil­i­tates mul­ti­ple pro­gram­matic ele­ments, such as a shop­ping mall, expe­ri­ence centre, museum of move­ment, a mul­ti­func­tional hall, a hotel and hous­ing towers. The design of the build­ing is based on the gen­er­a­tion of a max­i­mum inter­ac­tion with the sur­round­ings, espe­cially the tracks, with the Grand Stand accessed via a pro­grammed bridge.

From MVRDV’s project description:

The com­bi­na­tion of the racing activ­i­ties and the dry, arid land­scape gives the new Alcaniz race track area a dis­tinct char­ac­ter. Its devel­op­ment can be easily com­pared with Las Vegas. But can we learn from Vegas again? More ecol­ogy? Less gam­bling? More leisure based on the powers of the land­scape?
Maybe instead of an arti­fi­cial new icon, that spe­cific con­tra­dic­tion, this spe­cific sit­u­a­tion itself can lead to an out­stand­ingly remark­able devel­op­ment and approach. Each of the dif­fer­ent pro­grams have there own timing, size and char­ac­ter. By posi­tion­ing them close to each other, they can share their park­ing, they can create a cli­matic pocket and they can share a col­lec­tive plaza. And the rest of the grounds can be used in the future… It gives a com­pact set­tle­ment that enlarges the pos­si­bil­ity for remark­a­bil­ity in the vast land­scape.
By cov­er­ing the unde­ni­ably huge roofs of the pro­gram with the found mate­r­ial (red sand, stones, small plants, veg­e­ta­tion), the build­ings can obtain a heavy roof that can act as tem­per­a­ture buffer for the pro­gram. The build­ings gain a more eco­log­i­cal and nat­ural char­ac­ter. They “blend” in with the landscape.

Ciudad del motor - Elevation

Ciudad del Motor, Ele­va­tion (UN Studio – 2006, Alcaniz, Spain)

Ciudad del motor - Plan

Ciudad del Motor, Plan (UN Studio – 2006, Alcaniz, Spain)

Ciudad del Motor, Overall View

Ciudad del Motor, Over­all View (MVRDV – 2006, Alcaniz, Spain)

MVRDV, motor city competition entry - Getting Closer

Ciudad del Motor, Approach­ing (MVRDV – 2006, Alcaniz, Spain)

In related news, Ben van Berkel & Car­o­line Bos have been awarded the Charles Jencks Award, which is pre­sented annu­ally to the indi­vid­ual who has recently made a major con­tri­bu­tion both to the theory and prac­tice of archi­tec­ture. As the winner of this inter­na­tional award, Ben van Berkel will be giving a lec­ture at RIBA, in Jarvis Hall at 18:30 pm on 16th Octo­ber. Other recent projects of UN Studio include the Waldschlösschen bridge in Dres­den, which fea­tures the typ­i­cal flu­id­ity of the UN Studio’s project, but sur­prises with min­i­mal fragility in the elevation.

UN Studio about the bridge:

The design for the Waldschlösschen bridge in Dres­den cre­ates an infra­struc­tural con­nec­tion that spans a length of 800 meters accross the widest parts of the unique and beau­ti­ful Elb flood plain, form­ing an inte­gral part of this land­scape. From the banks of the sur­round­ing area, wide tran­si­tions taper to estab­lish an inter­con­nect­ing net­work for the con­tin­u­ous flows of the diverse users. The asym­met­ric and topo­graphic shape of the bridge evolves from its inher­ent con­di­tions, whilst simul­ta­ne­ously inte­grat­ing the bridge into the out­lines of the undu­lat­ing landscape.

Waldschlösschen View

Waldschlösschen Bridge View (UN Studio – 2007, Dres­den Germany)

Waldschloesschen Plan

Waldschlösschen Bridge Plan (UN Studio – 2007, Dres­den Germany)

8 Comments


  1. m

    fas­ci­nat­ing, how you cannot tell an MVRDV ren­der­ing from an OMA one any­more. On the one hand a bit boring, on the other: we’ll be able to dis­cuss archi­tec­ture again, not ren­der­styles!
    Won­der­ful project, anyway!

  2. toms

    Yes. I’ve also observed this con­ver­gence in render styles, just open the latest A10 or Mark pub­li­ca­tion. High qual­ity ren­der­ing isn’t an obscure magic any­more, only prac­ticed by nerdy gnomes in dark cel­lars. The now matur­ing genere­tion of archi­tects is the first one which put their hands on 3d visu­al­i­sa­tion soft­ware at uni­ver­sity, and takes it for granted. Which is good – just another tool. In adddi­tion to that, the high end fea­tures have become acces­si­ble – every­body can render with mental ray now and get the global illu­mi­na­tion, the subtle shad­ows, the caus­tics. And that shows.
    I hope, on the other hand, that this lib­er­a­tion from tech­ni­cal obsta­cles gets over this sim­i­lar­ity and gives way for a new vari­ety, where the medium again is explored, and not just employed.

  3. yullo

    First of all hello to my dys­turbed friends!!!

    To this dis­cus­sion I would add that the rep­re­sen­ta­tion can be out­sourced to a few excel­lent ren­der­ing offices doing the images for star­chi­tects: http://​www.​arte-​fac​tory.com/ for exam­ple.

    Some­times I feel that these unpol­luted “real images” over­shadow the look of the real build­ing once the con­struc­tion is done… noth­ing left for com­pre­hen­sion of the viewer and expres­sion of the cre­ator.

    On the other hand this seek for real­ity flat­tens any indi­vid­ual inves­ti­ga­tion in rep­re­sen­ta­tion (as in span­ish archi­tect Isas­kun Chinchilla’s draw­ings and others (see: http://​www.​fresh​madrid.​com/​e​s​t​u​d​i​o​s​.html).

    Be aware of “reality” I would say!

Other Sites on this post

  1. 1 ona: Motor City - UN Studio, MVRDV at dysturb.net | dysturb.net is our shared mindscape on the visual, spatial & urban culture of the dutch architecture sc
  2. 2 Spacemakers - Nieuws - Motor City volgens UN Studio en volgens MVRDV
  3. 3 Motor City by UN Studio, "Hot" Hi-Tech Design Firm - myarchN
  4. 4 Motor City by UN Studio, "Hot" Hi-Tech Design Firm - myarchN
  5. 5 Archinect : Discussion Forum : Random Tangents : MVRDV masterplan in Tirana

Add a Comment